Benjamin Gitlow
Gitlow distributed literature for the Communist Party of the United States
The Court “assume[d] that freedom of speech and of the press—which are protected by the First Amendment from abridgment by Congress— are among the fundamental personal rights and ‘liberties’ protected by the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment from impairment by the States.”
Justice Sanford wrote the majority opinion. He considered whether the New York law “deprived the defendant of his liberty of expression in violation of the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.”
Justice Holmes wrote that “there was no present danger of an attempt to overthrow the government by force on the part of the admittedly small minority who shared the defendant's views.” Therefore, the conviction was unconstitutional.
New York convicted Benjamin Gitlow of “criminal anarchy.” Like Schenck, Gitlow also distributed Socialist literature. The Supreme Court upheld New York’s restriction on speech. Gitlow, however, is an important case because it seemed to decide an important constitutional question: the First Amendment limited the state’s police power by virtue of the Fourteenth Amendment’s Due Process Clause. The Court “assume[d] that freedom of speech and of the press—which are protected by the First Amendment from abridgment by Congress—are among the fundamental personal rights and ‘liberties’ protected by the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment from impairment by the States.”